Ian Kay is at it again

Ian Kay is has been called an embarrassment to Men's and Family Rights' groups. His is the persistent passion of someone who truly believes they have been wronged, driven ever harder by the lifelong commitment of a native love and need for his children.
His words reflect desperation, and frustration turned to rage. His rage is dismissed as madness, or drunkenness.
After so many years -- Kay has been raging at the system for more than a decade. -- will his story ever be told fairly? It's doubtful. Ian Kay himself probably could not tell it.
Did the inequities of the system drive him to madness? Or did these inequities only exacerbate an already unstable mind?

Was, or is, the system reasonable and fair in denying him contact with his children?
Is all this passion, persistence, and energy only wasted?
Why does Ian Kay feel forced to rant and rage? Couldn't he, and many others like him, have made a contribution to Australia if their deepest feelings were not denied? I don't think there is any question there.
What would have happened if such passion and persistence were directed towards productive pursuits?

As someone who has experienced first hand the institutionalized prejudice of the Victorian legal system, I can understand the deep anger Mr Kay expresses -- to a point. I cannot share his rage at being denied his children. I can share the deep sense of betrayal by government and loved ones -- but not the pain of more than a decade.
I've tried to find more constructive avenues for my rage. It is, in the final analysis, a matter of personal choice. For Ian Kay, in a society that sees his anger as weakness, he has found no other avenue than to rage into the vast abyss of the Internet.

I cannot admire blind rage. Yet I must respect the persistence of someone who knows they have been wronged, especially since I share that experience.
And so, Mr Kay ... This is a graphic expression of a tragedy.

(Reproduced here by request. Formatting removed for legibility. Three messages.)

Politicians, I request you approach the Attorney General, Rob Hulls declaring me a vexatious litigant , while refusing to investigate this judicial corruption and malice.

The charges were a conspiracy between the Hierarchy of the Family Court, the Federal Department of Public Prosecutions, the Federal Police and the County Court.

A ‘specially selected , ‘little fat rat , and a mongrel bastard drunkard, judge Campbell of the County Court, gave me four months jail , for naming mongrel bastard Family Court judges, mongrel bastards , on letters I addressed to my children.

Campbell was aware that at the time I had been denied any contact or knowledge of my children for nine years , by this court , and that this was abuse of the Australian constitution and the United Nations , “Declaration of Human Rights.

Sylvia Clach, was given a two-year suspended sentence after she admitted swerving into a bike lane and killing cyclist, Anthony Marsh . Refer article “Herald- Sun “

It is claimed the law is an ass , if the courts can jail devoted fathers over trivia , who are being denied their children, while allowing a woman to walk free after admitting running down a cyclist and killing him , then the courts are the asses anus and the judges and magistrates are what the ass pushes through it.

This letter has been sent to judges , politicians, media and others and is being circulated worldwide on the internet Ian Kay Oct – 23 - 06.

Ian Kay Activist for children to have their father’s love and Protection C / O Somers P O 3927

Rob Hulls , the Victorian Attorney General, is too pathetic and cowardly to face me and he refuses to investigate this judicial corruption and malice , instead he declares me a vexatious litigant.

Phil Rodda , ( ‘ the specially selected ‘, known corrupt police magistrate ) gave me 8 months jail ( 4 months suspended) for postal breaches of a restraining order. * Rodda was aware I was trying to make contact with my children , as the courts were denying me contact, without any justification.

* Rodda did this to justify the Magistrates and Supreme courts, and police denying me bail for 2 months , over stalking charges. Rodda was compelled to dismiss, the stalking charges , because the of the obvious and embarrassing treachery, and perjury of the police and their witnesses, the charges were based upon.

At the same time, Rodda, gave Gregory Starrow , a community based order, after he admitted he was a member of a global internet child pornography ring, promoting heinous crimes against children , and owned more than 24,000 erotic pictures of children (and even babies !!)

Who is vexatious me or the system?

This letter has been sent to the judiciary, politicians, media and others, and has been emailed worldwide , on the internet Ian Kay March – 18 – 06.

Hull’s mother would have fornicated with a diseased rat, to produce something so low , that promotes legislation that can lead to the abuse of vulnerable children .

The Victorian Attorney General, Rob Hulls,

Is a Child Molesting Monster

A Professor of Human Science , Dr Stephen Baskerville, of the Harvard University claimed ;

"The epidemic of child abuse coincides directly with the epidemic of restraining orders against fathers “. --Brian Burdekin. the former Australian Human Rights Commissioner claimed ;
“ …….. there is a 500 to 600 percent increase in sexual abuse of girls when their natural father is removed from their lives.”

Hulls is very aware that the current taxpayer funded witch hunt against men in particular fathers, ( it has cost millions of dollars ! ) based on biased feminist concepts of domestic violence , phony statistics and lies , which he openly supports, leads to an increase in the physical and sexual abuse of children.

Hulls is aware, that Hospital records reveal that only 2% of women admitted to hospital with diagnosable injuries, were victims of domestic violence, and that women are responsible for most of the abuse and neglect of children. +


Hulls is very aware how children, who see their fathers evicted out of their homes and their lives, by the blatant use and abuse of restraining orders usually issued based on “allegations “ of violence , with no evidence to support them, are immediately lose their most natural and perfect protection – their father

Hulls will have the blood of abused children denied

their father’s protection on his hands .



This letter has been sent to the judiciary, media and others and is being circulated worldwide on the internet

Ian Kay Activist for children to have their father’s love and protection C/O P-O 3927 Australia