Questions

I keep hearing questions.

Wouldn't you expect serious "equity-driven" feminists to identify
unfair female advantages and biases in their favor and help eradicate
them along with lipstick and Barbie dolls? -- (anonymous)

After all, the (radical feminists) are always talking about how patronizing women, considering them the weaker sex, and dressing them up in ribbons and bows is degrading and disempowering, right?

Why then do they insist on gender biases that favor women at the
expense of justice?

"If the tincture of racial or ethnic prejudice or bias is enough, based on circumstances,to reverse laws, why are the blatantly discriminatory laws based on gender allowed to stand?

There is more than a faint coloring in these laws; there is a open prejudice in their wording.

And more, based on the statistics generated by their application, a powerful circumstantial argument for their prejudice and discrimination.

Let's call it
'FEMALE SUPREMACY".

Is there any group with "supremacy" in its moniker that is generally respected or approved? I don't think so. Why should we let self-styled champions of so-called women's rights get a free tilt. If we use their twisted lingo we are advertising for them and assuming much of their agenda - even as we oppose it! Think about it . . .

Why is Rob Hulls appointing women to high court positions in Victoria just because their resumes say "feminist"?

What sort of 'special policy' does Australia feel is needed for women? Perhaps more than a cabinet level office? Do the women of Australia require an embassy to the government?

Why is the Australian government putting $57 million dollars into campaigns which insult the nation and those principles that men and women have died for?
Why is the Australian government funding massive disinformation campaigns against men on the television?
Why is the Australian government funding numerous discriminatory actions throughout Australian to prejudice the Australian public against men and fathers?
What is the purpose of hundreds of publicly funded websites that depict men in the same ugly propoganda as Hitler and the Japanese during WWII?

How do all these actions correllate with the campaign to have Australian women make more children? ("One for mom; One for dad; and One for the ANZACs" ??)

Why are criminal charges against women who abuse the law and commit crimes considered "not in the public interest"?

Why are only lower ranks who abuse the Victorian police database punished?

Victoria Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon has confirmed the officers used the LEAP (Law Enforcement Assistance Program) system to check their personal details and information about friends, relatives and celebrities.
...
"Most of those involved have used the system to look up information about their partners, families or wives," Ms Nixon said.