At last!

At last!!! (see attached newspaper article!!!)

from another group..."Mother loses sons' custody over acces"

Tony M

Quote: "A Perth mother has lost custody of her two sons after illegally blocking her former husband from seeing the boys. An independent WA FamilyCourt expert found earlier this year that the mother was placing her sons, aged 11 and 13, at risk of emotional abuse by flouting court orders and preventing the boys from having a relationship with their father."
Keeping the door locked when dad turns up to see his kids is, simply, child abuse! I am glad that one judge recognises the fact!

These are interesting times! some Feminist Court Judges are using the new legislation to do the right thing by kids... but many are simple toeing the 'all men are barstards' line... Jamie Witt, we must note the names of these judges in the "hero" list! (please email me back to say that you have read this post)

Of course that's what happened last time the legislation changed, in 1995... meant to bring in shared parenting... it increased it a little... shared parenting orders jumped up to 5%!!! 5% Whooo Hooo! But over the following years, the rate went down and down, back to 2.5%... ie. 97.5% of kids lose a parent in the court!

Parental abuse (Malicious mother syndrome)
Children naturally love and want both parents. If you ask a child which parent they want, they almost always answer “Both!!!” However occasionally an abusive parent can coach the children to hate the other parent. This is called Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS).

This is emotional abuse. The non-custodial parent is ridiculed and degraded, brainwashing a child’s natural love of their other parent[i]. If a child is being abused in this way, then the court should save the child from this abuse by reducing the time that the child spends with their abuser.

Parental alienation relies on the perpetrator having the majority of time with the children. Because that’s mostly the mother some American talk shows have called this ‘malicious mother syndrome’.

This is the classic example of children being used to hurt the Ex. But even when the Family Court has ordered contact, in the best interest of the child, we have found 18 citations to research showing that the custodial parent abuses their child by obstructing the visits. In a further 6 citations, the hurt inflicted on children when the custodial parent moves is discussed.

50-50 shared residence means that children have meaningful relationships with both parents. This makes it difficult for one parent to brainwash and alienate the kids.

In the same way, if a custodial parent refuses to open the door when Dad turns up for his court-ordered visitation... what happens? Sweet F-A...nothing.... he can call the cops, wave the piece of paper in the air, go back to court and get a second piece of paper as useless as the first...

The Feminist Court has a long history of not enforcing it's own decisions... decisions that are 'in the best interests of the child... thus a Custodial flaunting those court orders, is, simply committing child abuse!

--------------------------------------

[i] Richard A. Gardner. M.D.
American Journal of Family Therapy30(3):191-202 (2002).
Denial of the Parental Alienation Syndrome Also Harms Women
Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

James ADAMS (PartTimeParent)
Media - www.Fathers4equality-Australia.org
PartTimeParent@pobox.com
Ph 0417 258 364 Sydney, Australia

"The greatest love of all,
is a parent's love for their child!
Family Law betrays that love"

Please feel free to re-publish anything in this email.
Attributing it to Fathers4Equality or myself would be appreciated :-)